Authors are requested to update any pre-publication versions with a link to the final published article. We hypothesize that this response is caused by leaf structural change associated with altered tissue water status; under cold winter conditions, leaves often remove water from their mesophyll cells, preventing intracellular freezing, as ice formation within the cells of the leaves is deadly (Steponkus, 1984; Li & Christersson, 1993; Buchanan et . In your recommendations for the author, you should: Remember to give constructive criticism even if recommending rejection. 1 INTRODUCTION. //-->wiley manuscript status under consideration Beginning in early 2020, AIChE Journal is participating in a pilot of the under review service, Wiley's new initiative to streamline the early sharing of research and open up the peer review process. I think you may send an email to the editor office to get the reason. After all research is an incomplete, on-going project by its nature. MR and TJK conceived the study. It's been one and a half months in my case and the status of the manuscript still the same. 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. . Is the paper's premise interesting and important? our publication is in the same situation (in second round of submission, after performing revision experiments). Under review: The paper is with reviewers for comment or waiting for the Action Editor's decision. Authors may make the case that a topic hasn't been investigated in several years and that new research is required. Register for comprehensive research tips and expert advice on English writing, journal publishing, good publication practices, trends in publishing, and a lot more. Conservation Biology welcomes submissions that address the science and practice of conserving biological diversity. The manuscript cannot be under consideration by another journal at any time that it is under consideration by JBMR Plus. Please keep a copy of the original manuscript for reference. With the same molecule precursor and growth procedure, we show one-billion-fold enhancement in electrical conductivities of amorphous monolayers by simply varying the growth temperature (325 C . hotstar interview leetcode services@everythingwellnessdpc.com (470)-604-9800 ; precision exams login Facebook. Introduction. I am asking specifically for RNA extraction for VTM containing COVID-19 SARS-CoV-2 virus particles. Peer-review is handled by researchers and scholars. Hopefully, your paper will be rigorously reviewed by an expert in the field and be accepted soon in your intended journal. Manuscripts is a free authoring tool designed specifically for authors of scientific articles. Try to respond to invitations promptly - it will prevent delays. Volume 73, Issue 3. "Be clear in their comments to the author (or editor) which points are absolutely critical if the paper is given an opportunity for revision." Even if you are coming to the opinion that an article has serious flaws, make sure you read the whole paper. Editage Insights is funded by Editage and endorses services provided by Editage but is editorially independent. Most editors have access to software that can check for plagiarism. Editorial decision-making: what are the possible outcomes for a manuscript? However, there is no guarantee that the preprints get published. Use your Google, Twitter of ORCiD account to get started. Depending on the reviewers, a manuscript will be returned to the author(s) for revision or considered unsuitable. Please update if any progress ormore information regarding these journals. Molecular assessment of dietary variation in neighbouring primate Frontiers | How good is the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator for predicting Visit our Wiley Author Learning and Training Channel for expert advice on peer review. The role of brain structure in the association between pubertal timing Originality and topicality can only be established in the light of recent authoritative research. A Critical Comparison of Mildly Acidic versus Alkaline Zinc Batteries Different assembly mechanisms of leaf epiphytic and endophytic bacterial communities underlie their higher diversity in more diverse forests. The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest. //-->What are the chances of publication if the manuscript has passed the How can this be corrected? The review process may take a few weeks or even months. This will often comprise a range of questions followed by comment sections. The detailed read-through should take no more than an hour for the moderately experienced reviewer. The Action Editor may decide to make a decision without allocating reviewers. Depending on the journal, the assignment may be done by technical staff, the journal's chief editor, or automatic by submission category or author suggestion. Thank you Mr. Tong Wu for your generous advice. Across these 10 studies, there were 452 children implanted at age 12 months, and 1189 children implanted at an age . HANDBOOK: Keep calm and wait: A guide to understanding journal statuses. About the Journal. If the authors submit a revised manuscript, the workflow is mostly the same as for the initial submission. Since speed is often an important factor, some journals make a point of advertising their typical review/decision times. Early prediction of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias using 1 ADRD gradually diminishes the quality of life of the affected older population. How long should I wait for a response from the journal? If you are unsure it may be better to disclose these in the confidential comments section. Headache is the official publication of the American Headache Society (AHS). The original high-resolution files are tracked and exported along with your manuscript. 1 Answer to this question Answer: Usually the status "Under review" indicates that the paper has cleared the admin check and it has been sent to the external peer reviewer or in-house section editor. Judging fit for purpose includes consideration of the AOP and associated . If plagiarism is discovered only after publication, the consequences are worse for both authors and readers, because a retraction may be necessary. How long should I wait for a response from the journal? 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Clin Ultrasound 43:406-411, 2015. If the initial reviews are conflicting, Are there any factual, numerical or unit errors? This section is usually no more than a few paragraphs and may be presented as part of the results and discussion, or in a separate section. 1. If so, what are they? An ORCID ID is required for first and corresponding authors and is strongly encouraged for all authors.