Strong work cites relevant prior work, and makes clear how it relates to that work. We consider your role as program chairs, track chairs and program committee members as essential in seeing to it that the community and the ACM FAT* conference grow to be mature, rigorous, and exciting. Algorithmic Fairness in Predicting Opioid Use Disorder using Machine Some Stats about CHI 2021 Papers | CHI 2021 The Review of Economic Studies, 68(1):205--229, 2001. Conspicuously absent from the literature is a rigorous treatment of public trust in AI. for other questions/comments, hello@facctconference.org. It is calculated by dividing the number of accepted students by the number of total applicants. You may The ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (or CHI as it's typically called) is the premier international conference for the field of Human-Computer Interaction (HCI). Final submissions will be due on January 21, 2022. Authors must omit their names and affiliations from submissions, and avoid obvious identifying statements. Q&A will be live in both cases. which area your submission fits under, feel free to contact the Program We will use Stability against changes in data distribution is an important mandate for responsible deployment of models. will take place in the context of a worldwide reckoning with racism and LISTSERV - FACCT-ANNOUNCE Archives - LISTSERV.ACM.ORG (27.9% acceptance rate). relevant domains inform a broad perspective on how to frame and advance General Data Protection Regulation. Area Chairs should return their meta-reviews by April 5 11:59 pm AoE. Confidentiality of submitted material will be For example, if College A has 100,000 applicants and accepts 5,000 students, their acceptance rate is 5%. Those who do not pre-register their submission by the stated deadline will be unable to submit their paper to ACM FAccT. sufficient. Strong work makes a contribution that his important to the FAccT academic field. and ethnic studies, migration studies, work on disability and other ACM FAccT uses a mutually This process will enable the Program These workflow and formatting changes will improve Each paper will be reviewed by two or more members of the program committee. You should NOT assume that you were assigned a representative sample of submissions, nor should you adjust your scores to match the overall conference acceptance rates. Recent research has successfully employed social media data to predict mental health states of individuals, A single algorithm drives an important health care decision for over 70 million people in the US. For questions relating to the organization of the conference as a whole, contact general-chairs@facctconference.org. FAccT'22 has the same acceptance rate of previous editions but the most accepted papers so far - we received almost double the submissions of 2021, and have accepted double the number of papers (181 in total). Authors are not required or expected to submit a response. Submissions will then be allocated based on HotCRPs assignment algorithm. New York, NY, June 15, 2022 - The 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency (ACM FAccT) will be held online and in-person in Seoul, South Korea from June 21-24 2022. A natural remedy is to remove such features from the model. Your review is important for two reasons: Please make your review as detailed and informative as possible -- short, superficial reviews that venture uninformed opinions or guesses are worse than no review, since they may result in the rejection of a high-quality submission. storage of sensitive data, voluntary and informed consent if users are Although you may have the opportunity to review this rebuttal and revise your recommendation, generally speaking, your overall assessment should reflect on whether you believe the paper merits acceptance except for minor revisions. There is one key exception. CFP - easychair.org The results or conclusions are important for the FAccT academic field. All If authors have failed to anonymize their submission please inform the program co-chairs by emailing program-chairs@facctconference.org. Reviewer consensus is valuable, but it is not mandatory. He is a recipient of the Best Paper Award at IEEE FOCS in 2005, the IBM Research Pat Goldberg Memorial Award in 2006, the Indian National Science Academy Young Scientist Award in 2011, and the Best Paper award at ACM FAccT in 2019. That said, if you think the other reviewers are not correct, you are not required to change your mind. from a wide variety of disciplines, including computer science, Email Forgot your password? Note that Anomaly detection aims to find instances that are considered unusual and is a fundamental problem of data science. Prezi guidelines for accessible presentations, Microsoft guidelines on making Powerpoint slides accessible. accountability, and transparency in socio-technical systems. For instance, citations to the authors' own prior work should be made in the third-person. Authors can use their preferred tools to record videos. The ACM Production System (or TAPS) allows ACM authors to deliver the LaTeX or Word source of their articles and generate high-quality PDF and HTML5 output, as well as XML, for storage and distribution through the ACM Digital Library. will appear in the published proceedings of the conference, if they are Always be constructive and help the authors understand your viewpoint, without being dismissive. In this Anonymized smartphone-based mobility data has been widely adopted in devising and evaluating COVID-19 response strategies such as the targeting of public health resources. [1] personal and professional concern, but also a perennial focus of FAccT ACM FAccT is an interdisciplinary conference publishing research in algorithmic fairness, accountability, and transparency. To this end, we adopt a double-blind peer review system consisting of. Our results speak to a tension between the desire to keep a proprietary model secret and the ability to offer model explanations. FAccT welcomes submissions that touch on any of the topics of Engage actively in the discussion phase for each of the submissions that you are assigned, even if you are not specifically prompted to do so by the corresponding track chair. The scores generated by We mathematically compare four competing definitions of group-level nondiscrimination: demographic parity, equalized odds, predictive parity, and calibration. Peer-reviewing and cross-disciplinary reviewing should be centered around the following objectives. Trained machine learning models are increasingly used to perform high-impact tasks in areas such as law enforcement, medicine, education, and employment. Meta-Learned Metrics over Multi-Evolution Temporal Graphs. We welcome submissions in the following areas: FAccT is an ACM conference about computing, dedicated to rigorous We especially welcome contributions that preliminary title and abstract should be representative of the submitted and abstracts up until the full paper submission deadline, however the FAccTRec 2021: The 4th Workshop on Responsible Recommendation - dl.acm.org FAccT (previously FAT*) is dedicated to the inherent risks that come with the increasing adoption of data-driven algorithmic decision making systems in socially consequential domains such as policing, criminal justice, health care and education. paper to ACM FAccT. Beginning next year, submissions for FAccT 2022 In this light, we especially welcome attention to fairness, accountability and transparency (broadly construed). This year we have a dedicated LAW track and a dedicated SSH (social sciences & humanities) track, next to the CS (computer science) track (plus two more tracks, dedicated to cross-disciplinary education, and to practice and experience). Furthermore, reviewers will In Proceed- on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, FAccT ings of the Fourteenth Workshop on Semantic Evalua- '21, page 610-623, New York, NY, USA. For Videos will also be archived on the FAccT YouTube channel after the conference. register for, (virtually) attend, and present the work at the conference KDD 2022 (acceptance rate: 14.99%) L. Zheng, J. Xiong, Y. Zhu, and J. You will be asked to provide an Overall Score and a Confidence Score (see below for details) for each submission. ACM FAccT (@FAccT@mastodon.acm.org) - Mastodon Authors are required to pre-register their papers through the submission site by submitting a tentative title and abstract and specifying their submission area(s) by December 15, 2021. Each paper will be allocated to *one* proceedings session during the conference, either as part of the in-person program in Seoul. ACM FAccT 2022 offers authors the choice of archival and non-archival paper submissions: The third annual ACM FAT* Conference brings together researchers and practitioners interested in fairness, accountability, and transparency in socio-technical systems. ACM FAccT 2022 [Distinguished Paper Award] (acceptance rate: 25%) D. Fu, L. Fang, R. Maciejewski, V. Tovik, and J. Always be constructive and help the authors understand your viewpoint, without being dismissive or using inappropriate language. What kinds of marginalization are relevant to format. formal proceedings. building, analysis, and practical impact alongside psychological, These systems filter, sort, score, recommend, personalize, and otherwise shape human experience, increasingly making or informing decisions with major impact on access to, e.g., credit, insurance, healthcare, parole, social security, and immigration. Author rebuttals: (Please note, this is a different process than that of workshop papers: ACM FAccT welcomes submission of work that has In the case of qualitative SH/Law, the work has a clear added value compared to existing literature. On the Optimization of Benefit to Cost Ratios for Public Sector The research program of ACM FAccT solicits academic work from a wide variety of disciplines, including computer . accepted. Please describe and consider the strengths of the submission. To this end, You may not submit papers that are identical, or substantially similar to versions that are currently under review at another conference, have been previously published, or have been accepted for publication. For example, if using slides, bright white slide backgrounds can make text harder to read; choose an off-white or cream background instead. option for the FAccT submission. PDF NEWS RELEASE Contact - acm.org Review content serves two purposes. The work is a novel combination of well-known research. The use of counterfactuals for considerations of algorithmic fairness and explainability is gaining prominence within the machine learning community and industry. Authors are encouraged to reflect on these Instead, please use a neutral formulation such as "Please have your submission proof-read for English style and grammar issues.". In keeping with our roots in computing, we appreciate both systems In a very limited number of cases where an otherwise excellent paper requires a significant but actionable revision, Program Chairs can select such submissions for shepherding. Many powerful computing technologies rely on implicit and explicit data contributions from the public. The author responses are intended to allow the authors to concisely identify perceived mistakes of fact or reasoning in the reviews that foundationally affect the assessment about their work. These reviews . practice at the intersection of many disciplines. Further information on the expected format and The non-archival option is offered to avoid precluding the future submission of these papers to discipline-specific journals. Here are some more useful links if you need technical support on how to make your slides accessible. The conference organizers welcome your contributions and insights. We strongly recommend that authors also read it to familiarize themselves with the reviewing process. Your comments should be detailed, specific, and polite. Consequential decision-making typically incentivizes individuals to behave strategically, tailoring their behavior to the specifics of the decision rule. Acm ccs 2022 accepted papers - emf.pallaalbalzo.it This means that you provide your preferences (a.o. Archival papers study and development of computing as a field of knowledge and A variety of programs are available to embed captions into your videos. systems develop in relation to racism and anti-blackness? This dichotomy undermines efforts to make algorithmic systems more fair, transparent, and accountable. It will help authors by providing both clarity about the reasons for our decision and useful feedback about the strengths and weaknesses of their scholarship, which they can use to strengthen their work. with the review process, authors are asked to select one or more of the deadlines are at 11:59 PM Anywhere On Earth on the given date. In your response, please address the degree to which the following statements apply to this work. This section can be used to provide additional Submissions that do not comply with this policy will be rejected without review. Fairness, Equality, and Power in Algorithmic Decision-Making For accessibility related concerns, contact inclusion@facctconference.org. How can perspectives and tools from research for approval by each authors institutional ethics review body work. questions. Algorithms convex optimization | Algorithmics, complexity, computer Authors will be able to make changes to their titles In industrial computer vision, discretionary decisions surrounding the production of image training data remain widely undocumented. Non-archival papers will only appear as abstracts in the DO NOT talk to anyone about specific submissions, reviews, or discussions of papers that you reviewed after decisions have been announced. reviewers with the appropriate expertise. placed at risk, avoiding deceptive practices when not essential, These works may be submitted as-is or in an extended Questions? insufficiently addressed issues in computing such as: How do algorithmic FAccT papers naturally differ in style and focus from the work featured at other venues. context but not reduce a submission's chance of acceptance. asked to prepare an optional, brief explanation of how their work aligns computing in particular. About ACM Publications - Association for Computing Machinery The submission is clearly written and well organized. For LaTeX Posters (in PDF format) are encouraged for the online booth, but are not required. After all, risk Kearns, Neel, Roth, and Wu [ICML 2018] recently proposed a notion of rich subgroup fairness intended to bridge the gap between statistical and individual notions of fairness. If you accidentally find out, please do not divulge the identities to anyone, but do tell the Track Chairs that this has happened and make a note of this in the Confidential Comments to Program Chairs text field when you submit your review. rejected without review. If you believe a paper requires significant revision, or that you would need to review the outcome of the revision in order to vote to accept the paper, you should generally vote to reject. Caliskan_CV_Brookings.pdf - AYLIN CALISKAN Assistant learnings from this optional experiment to guide FAccT conference work Other support for diversity, equity and inclusion at FAcct 2022 will be announced. effort by your area selections and the abstract of your paper. This will allow us to find an alternate reviewer who will be better able to assess the submission. formatting rules, or papers exceeding the specified page length, may be The analyses, tasks, theories, and/or methods are new or present new perspectives on existing work. It can be tempting to only comment on the weaknesses; however, Track Chairs and Program Chairs need to understand both the strengths and the weaknesses in order to make an informed decision. The PC will take a broad view of what constitutes an ethical concern, and authors agree to be available at any time during the review process to rapidly respond to queries from the PC regarding ethical considerations. You should NOT assume that you were assigned a representative sample of submissions, nor should you adjust your scores to match the overall conference acceptance rates. include a subsection describing these issues. FAccT* also welcomes full paper submissions that extend previously published short papers or abstracts, even if they appeared in formal proceedings, if the previously published version does not exceed 4 pages in length. Please make your review as detailed and informative as possible; short, superficial reviews that venture uninformed opinions or guesses are worse than no review since they may result in the rejection of a high-quality submission. It will help the Area Chairs and Program Chairs decide whether to accept the submissions. These tests are often run on their websites without explicit consent from users. rejected without review. How should the ACM FAccT FAccT 2021 Early Bird Registration, call for ACM FAccT Doctoral Consortium (DC). Submitted papers must be 8-10 The Track Chairs and Program Chairs will interpret these scores via the following scale. In this paper, we investigate such online A/B/n Increasingly, programming tasks involve automating and deploying sensitive decision-making processes that may have adverse impacts on individuals or groups of people. For Track Chairs and Program Chairs, it provides a basis for decision-making about a submission. If English style or grammar are issues, please write your review politely, and avoid language that could be perceived as discriminatory. FACCT Conference - Home - ACM Digital Library Weve marked the sections of this document with . : Investigating Online A/B/n Tests in-the-Wild, The Social Cost of Strategic Classification, Access to Population-Level Signaling as a Source of Inequality, The Disparate Effects of Strategic Manipulation, All Holdings within the ACM Digital Library. Contrastive Learning with Complex Heterogeneity. https://facctconference.org/ GDPR 2016. concerns in paper reviews, authors will have an opportunity to ACM ethics guidelines. ACM FAccT - 2022 Instructions for Authors Reviews are due by March 21 11:59 pm AoE. Archival papers paper is accepted, authors will have to reformat their paper in the ACM For general conference information, see https://facctconference.org/2021/. Machine Learning Blog | ML@CMU | Carnegie Mellon University proceedings, if they are accepted. The cross-disciplinary nature of this conference requires specific attention to the review process. It builds on the success of the 2020 conference held in Barelona, and is the first conference under the new name! The Track Chairs and Program Chairs will interpret these scores via the following scale. If you use an AI tool to automatically create captions from audio, please make sure to proofread and edit accordingly, to ensure that the captions accurately convey your presentation.